RESUMEN
Background: Periodontitis is a multi-factorial chronic inflammatory disease of attachment apparatus of teeth with microorganisms playing a major role. To address periodontal disease various strategies have been adopted to target these periodonto-pathogens. Various antimicrobial drugs (systemic as well as local) are effectively used to control the disease. However due to various side effects ofsystemic administration of the drugs like gastro intestinal disturbances, development of resistant organisms, high dosage of the drug required, local delivery of the drug is a better option as the drug is directly delivered at the site of infection with minimum dosage and maximum response achieved thus eliminating all the undesired effects of the drug. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of 10% povidone iodine with 2% metronidazole and 1% ornidazole with 0.25% chlorhexidine gel as local delivery systems for the reduction in the pocket depth, changes in CAL, gingival inflammation. Materials and methods: A total of 20 patients diagnosed with mild- moderate chronic periodontitis were divided into two groups in a split-mouth study design - Group I and Group II with each group containing 20 sites with probing depth of >5 mm, CAL ?3 mm. In Group I, 10% povidine-iodine gel with 2% metronidazole was delivered inside the pocket and Group II, 1% ornidazole with 0.25% chlorhexidine was used as a local delivery system in adjunct to scaling and root planning. In both groups, medications were delivered at weekly interval for a period of 4 weeks. Baseline and 4 weeks measurements were done and compared for probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment levels (CAL) and gingival inflammation. Results: The results obtained were statistically analyzed. Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in terms of clinical parameters. However, there was statistically insignificant difference when compared between the two groups. The results clearly demonstrate that both povidone iodine with metronidazole and ornidazole with chlorhexidine are also useful in controlling the acute phase of the periodontal disease in adjunct to scaling and root planning (SRP). Conclusion: Both drugs when used as an adjunct to scaling and root planning enhances probing pocket depth reduction, change in clinical attachment levels and gingival inflammation in mild- moderate chronic periodontitis cases.
RESUMEN
Background: Management of gingivitis is commonly done by the removal of etiological agents by Periodontist. However, use of topical applications of antibiotic combinations has been shown to improve the treatment outcome. Various drugs alone or in combination have been used. So this study was conducted to determine the effect of different concentrations of combination drugs on gingivitis.Material & Methods:100 patients of gingivitis were divided into two groups of 50 each – Group-A and Group-B. After scaling and root planing, Group-A patients were made to apply Metronidazole 1% and Chlorhexidine 0.25% for period of 12 weeks while as Group-B patients applied Metronidazole 1.5% and Chlorhexidine 0.50% for 12 weeks. Baseline scores of gingival index and bleeding index were recorded followed by readings at 4 and 12 weeks.Results:Results showed that there was a significant improvement in gingivitis and bleeding on probing at 4 and 12 weeks after local application of Metronidazole and Chlorhexidine gel in both the groups. However there were no statistically significant differences between two groups.Conclusions:Topical application of Metronidazole and Chlorhexidine gel as an adjunct to scaling and root planing is an effective treatment modality for the management of gingivitis and the concentrations of the combination do not have any significant effect on the treatment.
RESUMEN
Background: Emergence of Covid-19 pandemic resulted in stressful living conditions throughout the world leading to an alteration of habits and detrimental effects on overall health particularly oral health and hygiene of people throughout the world. The aim was to access perceived stress and its impact on periodontium and oral health in Covid-19 positive patients.Material & Methods:An online health questionnaire was submitted by Covid-19 positive patients over a period of six months with answers regarding their systemic health, perceived stress, existing habits and their alteration, oral hygiene maintenance and symptoms of oral and periodontal diseases during covid positivity.Results:Results showed that there was increase in stress levels of Covid-19 positive patients with alteration of habits and increased incidence of negative effects on oral and periodontal health.Conclusions:Although Covid-19 positive patients experienced more stress and higher incidence of oral and periodontal diseases but no direct relation could be established.
RESUMEN
Background: Periodontal diseases are characterized by the presence of bleeding, inflammation, sensitivity, discomfort, mobility and tooth loss. Plenty of studies supported the assumption that vitamin D deficiency might be a risk factor for periodontal diseases. Our study aimed to investigate the true association between serum vitamin D level and the presence of periodontal disease. Materials and methods: The study evaluated 40 patients (age group 19-35 years) attending the outpatient department, Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Govt. Dental College and Hospital, Srinagar, equally divided into two groups (Group I and Group II) according to the inclusion criteria. Group I included generalized aggressive periodontitis patients while Group II included non periodontitis patients. Clinical parameters and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level were assessed. Results: Serum vitamin D levels of periodontitis patients compared to non-periodontitis patients presented non statistically significant differences (p-value = 0.878). Conclusion: Although the serum vitamin D level in aggressive periodontitis patients was lower than the healthy controls but the difference seemed to be statistically insignificant and hence it can be concluded that the serum vitamin D deficiency is not a risk factor for periodontitis.
RESUMEN
Aims: To assess the concentration of toxic heavy metals [Cadmium, Copper, Lead and Nickle] in dairy milk and animal feed of urban and rural areas and correlate them. Study Design: It was a cross-sectional comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted on the dairy milk and animal feed in milk farms of Peshawar. The samples were collected during June – July of 2010. Methodology: The study area was divided into two zones: urban area which was located in the centre of the city and rural area comprising of peri urban villages. Fifty milk samples were collected, 30 from urban and 20 from rural areas. Feed samples were also collected. Milk and feed samples were prepared by wet digestion method using HNO3 and H2O2 as described by Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) of North America, 1990. This was followed by analysis on Atomic Absorption Spectrometer. Results: The results showed that the mean concentration of toxic heavy metals under study namely Cadmium, Copper, Lead and Nickle were greater in dairy milk than the maximum residue limits (MRLs) of these elements as given by Joint Expert Committee on Food and Agriculture and World Health Organization. In comparison of urban and rural areas it was found that higher concentration of Cadmium, Copper, and Nickle was found